1. Selection of Films Programming
There
is a necessity to discuss the criteria for selecting a film. Festivals must
take children seriously, which was taken for granted and thus had not to
be discussed.
Wide variety distinct profile
On the one hand should each festival show a wide variety of productions,
on the other hand should each festival also develop its own distinct profile
(which is mostly the case anyway, although the participants complaint about
the fact that the same productions are shown at all festivals).
Content: All participants agreed on the following viewpoint after
having seen a movie children should leave the cinema optimistically and
full of hope. No matter what story has been told in the film, the end should
leave enough room for hope (which is not identical to a Happy End). The
life of children as a film-topic should be the main point of focus in selecting
festival films. The cultural value of festivals has to be emphasized, thus
it is important to stress the notion of film as an artform.
Jury versus individual person
No agreement could be come to on the question who should be responsible
for the actual selection of festival films, whether it should be a jury
or an individual person. Nevertheless the majority of participants was in
favor of the notion that an artistic director has positive influence on
the development of a distinct artistic festival profile.
Sales agents and producers wish for and expect better communication with
festivals as well as more information of them, and they also want more transparency
in the process of selecting or refusing a film. Especially sales agents
are of the opinion that subsidized film copies would be of great help, as
they could be sent to all the festivals.
Claim to producers: little children need films too!
As productions tend to focus more and more on older children and teenagers,
festivals would like to see a higher number of productions for children
age 5-7 (cf. Denmark). Production companies should be encouraged to take
action to produce short films. Directors should be animated to work for
young children, too.
To make communication between producers, sales agents and festivals easier,
the conference participants agreed to collect material on all European Children's
Film Festivals and to publish a folder including information on the program
and profile of each festival.
Disagreement about entry fees
The workgroups were in disagreement about financial issues in terms
of fees. On the one hand there were producers demanding festivals to pay
for films, as well as distributors who want festivals to contribute to the
expenses and on the other hand there was the fact that festivals do not
earn enough money from entry-fees as they have to be kept to an absolute
minimum. Thus, subsidized copies were considered a solution to the problem
(cf. The Netherlands).
2. Competition
Awards are essential for the media, as they increase the importance
of the festival and as they also make the festival atmosphere more exiting
and enthusiastic. They also rise the expectations of the audience. In this
respect a children's jury is very important. Its opinion should not only
be accepted but also in no respect manipulated.
Awards are important Who receives them?
It is important to distinguish between awards recognizing the artistic
value of a production and awards granted for the increase of the national
distribution of films. In order to be able to distinguish, it is essential
to establish rules. The artistic value of a movie is not necessarily the
decisive factor for the commercial success of a production, as well as an
award as such does not ensure its successful distribution, e.g. if the film
does not meet the criteria of the market.
3. Presentation
A Children's Film Festival is an event. This event includes more than
a mere presentation of movies. The ideal situation would thus be one in
which the festival is the highlight of continuous work, work that includes
the showing of children's film during the year on a regular basis.
Cherry on the cake
Unfortunately, it is mostly the financial situation that makes these
regular showings impossible as festivals barely have enough money for their
once-a-year-events. A festival on-tour would be an interesting way to tackle
the problems, as the number of people who could see the films would inevitably
go up, but seen from the producers' and distributors' viewpoints
this also results in a reduction of its commercial use.
The presentation of a festival as an event has a number of advantages. For
the media and consequently for the audience the actors are the highlights
of a festival and thus most important.
The audience meets actors pros meet each other
It is very exiting for children to meet actors and directors and to
discuss their roles and films. For festival directors, however, it is meetings
with sales agents and producers that are the most important and interesting
factor of a festival, as these meetings can have lasting effects. The notion
of festivals as meeting-points for experts of all fields related to children's
films is very important for future productions, as this communicative aspect
of festivals allows participants to exchange experiences and suggestions.
Thus, festivals should strengthen and extend their position as a (mediating)
platform for discussions between people involved in film productions and
the film audience.
Relationship to schools
For media-pedagogic goals it is neither sufficient nor sensible to
organize one single festival per year. Thus, it is also not enough to contact
schools only once a year (during the festival). On the contrary, a close
relationship to schools has to be established on a regular, year-round basis.
Special showings for schools are important in this respect, also from a
PR point of view. However, the audience should not only be from schools,
as this would be too easy and on the long run not useful.
Film Version various systems
There is no unified system of techniques, various different ways of
presenting a film exist side by side. Festivals as such could not agree
on which system is most appropriate, whether it is subtitles (starting at
9 years of age), voice-over versions with (slightly) turned down original
voices, original version with real-time dubbing via headsets, or whether
the children should be sufficiently prepared to watch and understand the
original versions. The soon-to-come voice-over CD-Rom system will solve
this problem in the future.
4.
Public relations
Good connections to the Press pay off! The energy put into announcements,
press material, press screenings is essential for the benefit of the festival.
Thus, press work should not only include regional newspapers but also national
film periodicals, although the amount of press work depends on the festivals'
importance or status (regional, national, international), on its profile
as a festival, and also on its program. A lot of festivals do not use the
media. This has to be changed. Only a few use either new media such as the
internet or approved, successful ways to promote themselves, such as trailers.
Cooperation with TV-Stations differs from festival to festival. Bellinzona
and Poznan, for instance, have their daily TV program. It is very important
to use all kinds of media to give out as much information about the festivals
as possible. News are very important in this respect, as a short report
in the prime-time news are definitely worth more than a 30 minutes program
broadcast at an inappropriate spot. Although everyone agreed on the importance
of press work, it was also commonly acknowledged that press work is very
time-consuming and intense.
All festivals agree on the importance of marketing. The cooperate design
is thus very essential and has to be well considered as it represents the
festival in public, forms the public opinion of the festival and also strongly
influences the commercial success of the festival. The festival in Oulu,
Finland, for example, sends out its catalogue to approx. sixty thousand
households, which guarantees its success, but is financially not feasible
for other festivals. Catalogues are important for the documentation of the
festivals, both in terms of regional importance and development of the program.
They should be a profound source of information and present the films so
that people want to watch them. Since subsidies generally go back, new ways
of cooperation and commercialization have to be found (cf. joint-ventures
with multiplex-cinemas).
5. Financial matters
In general subsidies have decreased. 80% of the budget of Children's
Film Festivals is from public funds. Only a small percentage of the festivals
receive subsidies granted by the European Union. Thus, more private funds
have to be raised. Festivals agree that sponsors are important in this respect
but nevertheless only with a few reservations. Firstly, for some festivals
the energy put into sponsoring does not meet the (relatively) small financial
outcome and secondly, some festivals have ideological reason why not to
be sponsored. However, for most festivals sponsoring as a means to increase
their budget is feasible yet impossible. Nevertheless, Children's Film Festivals
aim for sponsors like those in professional ski racing or car racing.
There is strong urge of Children's Film Festivals to get more support by
the European Union including more transparency and less bureaucratic efforts
in dealing with applications for subsidies. (This problem does not seem
to be festival specific but EU-specific.)
An alternative to sponsoring are donations (cf. Gera). They are tax-deductible
and also ideologically justifiable as nothing is expected in return.
Final Statement:
There is enormous demand for better coordination between the festivals including
exchange of material and information.
Better cooperation and coordination by exchanging information:
| Survey | Version Francaise | next |